Patrick henry vs martin luther king jr essay

For instance, Mahatma Gandhi used this interpretation to suggest an equivalence between Thoreau's civil disobedience and his own satyagraha. After that year, Luther married and had children; he also organized many evangelical churches with the support of princes throughout much of northern Europe.

Luther new duties served to drive him deeper into Scripture. The main difference between the two speeches, in a general sense was that one calls for a change through violence and war, while the other calls for a peaceful solution. King found a law to be unjust, then civil disobedience would be correct and morally right.

King says that a just law is that law that aligns with the moral law or the law of God. His deepest desire was to see the church return to the early teachings and to leave behind the abuses that had developed. There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them.

A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. They displayed this through the good, similar rhetorical devices that they used, and through the way their audience reacted to their speeches.

I should feel as if I were worth less in that case. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which I also believe,—"That government is best which governs not at all;" and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have.

In the case of the United States, the Constitution itself enshrines the institution of slavery, and therefore falls under this condemnation. Although this is an acceptable dictionary definition of the word civil, it is not what is intended here. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Martin Luther King And Patrick Henry: Cry For Freedom

But if the law is itself clearly unjust, and the lawmaking process is not designed to quickly obliterate such unjust laws, then Thoreau says the law deserves no respect and it should be broken.

Scholars can say little about his childhood other than the angry, strict character of his father made life difficult for a young boy. Both men were taking risks by speaking the ways and at the times they did speak.

He exhorts people not to just wait passively for an opportunity to vote for justice, because voting for justice is as ineffective as wishing for justice; what you need to do is to actually be just. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.

Patrick Henry uses biblical allusion when he states, "It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our Country. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose.This paper compares and contrasts athe speeches of Martin Luther King Jr.

and Patrick Henry, looking at their differing appeals for freedonm. Cry for Freedom Although Patrick Henry and Martin Luther King, Jr. are both skilled orators and use similar rhetorical devices to appeal to their audiences, they call for freedom for two totally different [ ].

Essay about Comparing Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X During the Civil Rights Movement of the ’s in the United States, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X had different methods and philosophies for trying to accomplish the very similar goal of civil rights for African Americans.

Exploring the Power of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Words through Diamante Poetry Students explore the ways that powerful and passionate words communicate the concepts of freedom, justice, discrimination, and the American Dream in Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech.

Analyzing Famous Speeches as Arguments

Although Patrick Henry and Martin Luther King, Jr. are both skilled orators and use similar rhetorical devices to appeal to their audiences, they call for freedom for two totally different kinds of people.

Both Patrick Henry and Martin Luther King, Jr. show their strengths as speakers through their use of these rhetorical devices. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr.

write about the injustice of government laws, of right and wrong, and one’s moral and upstanding conscience of a human being. Martin Luther King Jr. is a religious, peaceful man who uses non-violent rallies to gather American’s to unite against segregation for the greater good and future of America.

Martin Luther King, Jr. American civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was also influenced by this essay.

In his autobiography, he wrote: During my student days I read Henry David Thoreau's essay On Civil Disobedience for the first time. Here, in this courageous New Englander's refusal to pay his taxes and his choice of jail rather than support a war that would spread slavery's territory into Mexico, I .

Patrick henry vs martin luther king jr essay
Rated 4/5 based on 22 review